TY - JOUR
T1 - Urban landscape organization is associated with differences in avian-mediated regulating ecosystem services
AU - Izquierdo, Lucía
AU - Diaz, Mario
AU - Benedetti, Yanina
AU - Jokimäki, Jukka
AU - Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, Marja-Liisa
AU - Morelli, Federico
AU - Pérez-Contreras, Tomás
AU - Rubio, Enrique
AU - Sprau, Philipp
AU - Jukka, Suhonen
AU - Tryjanowski, Piotr
AU - Ibáñez-Álamo, Juan Diego
PY - 2025/11/27
Y1 - 2025/11/27
N2 - Urbanization alters ecosystems through multiple biotic and abiotic changes that directly affect urban biodiversity. However, we still lack information on how urban areas influence the ecosystem services provided by wildlife, particularly regulating ecosystem services (RES) such as seed dispersal, pollination, pest control, and scavenging. Recent studies have shown marked differences in animal communities depending on urban landscape configuration, which ranges from land-sharing (low-density housing with small, fragmented green areas) to land-sparing (high-density housing with large, unfragmented green areas). Because this gradient affects animal communities, we expect it to also influence potential ecosystem service provision. In addition, several local urban attributes may influence these communities and, consequently, could also affect RES provision. To address these research questions and their potential temporal variation, we collected bird assemblage data from nine European cities during the breeding and non-breeding seasons. We used bird diets and abundances to identify the main species providers of the four avian-mediated RES mentioned above and analyzed their variation in potential service provision along the urban landscape organization gradient. Land-sharing areas provided higher potential scavenging (both seasons), seed dispersal (non-breeding), and pest control (non-breeding). Several urban attributes (e.g., abundance of fleshy fruit-bearing plants) significantly enhanced RES, while others (e.g., built cover) reduced them, although these effects varied seasonally. These findings provide new insights into the debate on how cities can be more biodiversity-friendly and can help to implement measures based on local urban attributes that promote RES provision, both of which are vital for urban ecosystems and citizens’ well-being.
AB - Urbanization alters ecosystems through multiple biotic and abiotic changes that directly affect urban biodiversity. However, we still lack information on how urban areas influence the ecosystem services provided by wildlife, particularly regulating ecosystem services (RES) such as seed dispersal, pollination, pest control, and scavenging. Recent studies have shown marked differences in animal communities depending on urban landscape configuration, which ranges from land-sharing (low-density housing with small, fragmented green areas) to land-sparing (high-density housing with large, unfragmented green areas). Because this gradient affects animal communities, we expect it to also influence potential ecosystem service provision. In addition, several local urban attributes may influence these communities and, consequently, could also affect RES provision. To address these research questions and their potential temporal variation, we collected bird assemblage data from nine European cities during the breeding and non-breeding seasons. We used bird diets and abundances to identify the main species providers of the four avian-mediated RES mentioned above and analyzed their variation in potential service provision along the urban landscape organization gradient. Land-sharing areas provided higher potential scavenging (both seasons), seed dispersal (non-breeding), and pest control (non-breeding). Several urban attributes (e.g., abundance of fleshy fruit-bearing plants) significantly enhanced RES, while others (e.g., built cover) reduced them, although these effects varied seasonally. These findings provide new insights into the debate on how cities can be more biodiversity-friendly and can help to implement measures based on local urban attributes that promote RES provision, both of which are vital for urban ecosystems and citizens’ well-being.
KW - towns and cities
KW - Europe
KW - birds
KW - urban landscape
KW - seasonal variations
KW - urbanisation
KW - ecosystem services
KW - urban environment
KW - urban design
KW - sustainable development
KW - ecosystems
U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105540
DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105540
M3 - Article
SN - 0169-2046
VL - 267
JO - Landscape and Urban Planning
JF - Landscape and Urban Planning
IS - March 2026
M1 - 105540
ER -