Unmanned, Remotely Piloted, or Something Else?: Analysing the Terminological Dogfight

Mikko Tapani Huttunen

Unmanned, Remotely Piloted, or Something Else? Analysing the Terminological Dogfight

Julkaisun otsikon käännös: Miehittämätön, kauko-ohjattu vai jokin muu? Katsaus käsitekamppailuun

Tutkimustuotokset: Kirjoitus lehdessä tai erikoisnumeron toimittaminen › Artikkeli › Tieteellinen › vertaisarvioitu

Abstrakti

Artikkelissa analysoidaan käsitteitä, joita kansainväliset ja kansalliset ilmailuviranomaiset ovat omaksuneet kuvaamaan miehittämättömiä ilma-aluksia.

Julkaisun otsikon käännös	Miehittämätön, kauko-ohjattu vai jokin muu? Katsaus käsitekamppailuun
Alkuperäiskieli	englanti
Sivut	349–368
Julkaisu	Air & Space Law
Vuosikerta	42
Numero	3
Tila	Julkaistu - 2017
OKM-julkaisutyyppi	A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli

Hakusanat

rpas
uav
uas
drones
drooni
ilmailu
ilmailuoikeus
ICAO
EASA
rpa
siviili-ilmailu

Tieteenala

Oikeustiede

2 Päättyneet

UAV-MEMO: Miehittämättömät ilma-alukset malminetsinnässä ja kaivostoiminnan valvonnassa Suomen arktisilla alueilla
Viikari, L. & Huttunen, M. T.
TEKES, Kaivosyritykset
01.01.2015 → 31.12.2016
Projekti: Yhteisrahoitteinen projekti

Tiedosto
AIRBEAM: Airborne information for Emergency situation Awareness and Monitoring
Viikari, L., Karhu, J. & Huttunen, M. T.
EUROOPANKOMISSIO
01.01.2012 → 20.02.2017
Projekti: Yhteisrahoitteinen projekti

3 Konferenssiesitelmä
1 Vierailu ulkomailla

Civil (tort) Liability Pursuant to Finnish Aviation Law: UAS/drones
Mikko T. Huttunen (Puhuja)
9 syysk. 2022
Aktiviteetti: Esitelmä › Konferenssiesitelmä
Law and Technological Change: A Typology
Mikko Huttunen (Puhuja)
12 marrask. 2019
Aktiviteetti: Esitelmä › Konferenssiesitelmä

Tiedosto
Unmanned Aircraft Systems: The New Paradigm of Air Law?
Mikko Huttunen (Puhuja)
13 maalisk. 2019
Aktiviteetti: Esitelmä › Konferenssiesitelmä

Tiedosto
Leiden University
Mikko Huttunen (Vieraileva tutkija)
1 elok. 2018 → 30 marrask. 2018
Aktiviteetti: Vierailu ulkoisessa instituutiossa › Vierailu ulkomailla

Julkaisuja: Teoksia yliopistolaisilta
Mikko Huttunen
15.06.2017
1 kohde/ Medianäkyvyys
Mediasisältö: Tutkimus
Ilmojen halki käy miehittämättömän ilma-aluksen tie
Mikko Huttunen
30.09.2016
1 kohde/ Medianäkyvyys
Mediasisältö: Tutkimus
Lapin yliopistolle rahoitusta lennokkien tutkimiseen
Mikko Huttunen
15.03.2015
1 kohde/ Medianäkyvyys
Mediasisältö: Tutkimus

Viite tähän julkaisuun

@article{1c161a8880a345d989d4f803c81f6fa6,

title = "Unmanned, Remotely Piloted, or Something Else?: Analysing the Terminological Dogfight",

abstract = "Throughout their existence, several attempts have been made at naming and categorizing aircraft which are flown without a pilot on board. Regulatory documents by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have called them unmanned and remotely piloted aircraft (systems), drones, and other less popular names. This has resulted in a risk of gaps and incoherence being introduced into the system of international aviation law. The growing field of unmanned aviation has proved difficult to encapsulate in a single term which would serve as a regulatory basis.This article seeks to analyse the terminological dogfight between the most established terms used to regulate the aircraft in question. It presents the legal basis, meaning, implications, and relevance of each term and their mutual relationship.The article recommends doing away with the concept of model aircraft, as it has become difficult to distinguish recreational from non-recreational use of the aircraft in question. A critical angle is taken at the concept of pilotless aircraft, employed in the Chicago Convention. The article acknowledges that both unmanned and remotely piloted aircraft are viable regulatory concepts, but preference is given to the former due to its simplicity and wide scope. The concept of a system is seen as necessary due to the distributed nature of the aircraft.",

keywords = "rpas, uav, uas, drones, drooni, ilmailu, ilmailuoikeus, ICAO, EASA, rpa, siviili-ilmailu, drones, unmanned aerial vehicles, rpas, uav, uas, ICAO, EASA, aviation, civil aviation, aviation law, rpa",

author = "Huttunen, {Mikko Tapani}",

year = "2017",

language = "English",

volume = "42",

pages = "349–368",

journal = "Air & Space Law",

issn = "0927-3379",

publisher = "Kluwer Law International",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unmanned, Remotely Piloted, or Something Else?

T2 - Analysing the Terminological Dogfight

AU - Huttunen, Mikko Tapani

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Throughout their existence, several attempts have been made at naming and categorizing aircraft which are flown without a pilot on board. Regulatory documents by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have called them unmanned and remotely piloted aircraft (systems), drones, and other less popular names. This has resulted in a risk of gaps and incoherence being introduced into the system of international aviation law. The growing field of unmanned aviation has proved difficult to encapsulate in a single term which would serve as a regulatory basis.This article seeks to analyse the terminological dogfight between the most established terms used to regulate the aircraft in question. It presents the legal basis, meaning, implications, and relevance of each term and their mutual relationship.The article recommends doing away with the concept of model aircraft, as it has become difficult to distinguish recreational from non-recreational use of the aircraft in question. A critical angle is taken at the concept of pilotless aircraft, employed in the Chicago Convention. The article acknowledges that both unmanned and remotely piloted aircraft are viable regulatory concepts, but preference is given to the former due to its simplicity and wide scope. The concept of a system is seen as necessary due to the distributed nature of the aircraft.

AB - Throughout their existence, several attempts have been made at naming and categorizing aircraft which are flown without a pilot on board. Regulatory documents by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have called them unmanned and remotely piloted aircraft (systems), drones, and other less popular names. This has resulted in a risk of gaps and incoherence being introduced into the system of international aviation law. The growing field of unmanned aviation has proved difficult to encapsulate in a single term which would serve as a regulatory basis.This article seeks to analyse the terminological dogfight between the most established terms used to regulate the aircraft in question. It presents the legal basis, meaning, implications, and relevance of each term and their mutual relationship.The article recommends doing away with the concept of model aircraft, as it has become difficult to distinguish recreational from non-recreational use of the aircraft in question. A critical angle is taken at the concept of pilotless aircraft, employed in the Chicago Convention. The article acknowledges that both unmanned and remotely piloted aircraft are viable regulatory concepts, but preference is given to the former due to its simplicity and wide scope. The concept of a system is seen as necessary due to the distributed nature of the aircraft.

KW - rpas

KW - uav

KW - uas

KW - drones

KW - drooni

KW - ilmailu

KW - ilmailuoikeus

KW - ICAO

KW - EASA

KW - rpa

KW - siviili-ilmailu

KW - drones

KW - unmanned aerial vehicles

KW - rpas

KW - uav

KW - uas

KW - ICAO

KW - EASA

KW - aviation

KW - civil aviation

KW - aviation law

KW - rpa

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 349

EP - 368

JO - Air & Space Law

JF - Air & Space Law

SN - 0927-3379

IS - 3

ER -

Unmanned, Remotely Piloted, or Something Else? Analysing the Terminological Dogfight

Abstrakti

Hakusanat

Tieteenala

Sormenjälki

Projektit

Aktiviteetit

Lehtileikkeet

Viite tähän julkaisuun