Abstrakti
Sovereignty and the right to property share a common function,
and may be seen as equivalent. This paper intends to argue
such equivalence. In order to do so, it builds on COASE s
economic theory of property, and shows a close relation
between COASE s Theorem and the work of THOMAS HOBBES,
which has, in turn, set much of the basic framework of modern
international law. This interjection serves as the starting point
for comparing HOBBES Commonwealth with property rights,
but finds considerable differences in their nature. However, these differences are not present when comparing property
with the Commonwealth s main feature: sovereignty. By
applying certain methodological tools of comparative law,
these similarities lead us to conclude that sovereignty and
property, as legal institutions, follow the same logic, a
conclusion that will be useful for further theorization on
international law & economics.
| Alkuperäiskieli | englanti |
|---|---|
| Sivut | 195-229 |
| Sivumäärä | 35 |
| Julkaisu | International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional |
| Vuosikerta | 4 |
| Numero | 8 |
| Tila | Julkaistu - 2006 |
| Julkaistu ulkoisesti | Kyllä |
| OKM-julkaisutyyppi | A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli |
Tieteenala
- Oikeustiede