How Should Impacts Be Assessed?

Gunhild Rosqvist, Hannu I. Heikkinen, Leena Suopajärvi, Carl Österlin

Tutkimustuotokset: Kirjoitus kirjassa/raportissa/konferenssijulkaisussaLukuTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Abstrakti

Industrial development and resource exploitation in Arctic Fennoscandia have caused cascading and cumulative effects on environment and people since the late nineteenth century. The increasing demand for minerals and metals to facilitate a ‘green transition’ now pose further challenges for environmental and social management. In this chapter we present local attempts to provide additional knowledge and understanding of the full impact from multiple human activities beyond conventional corporate-led impact assessments. With the aim to reveal the full range of impacts from industrial developments on their livelihood, Laevas, Gabna and Semisjaur-Njarg Sámi reindeer herding communities in Sweden produced their own assessment of cumulative effects based on detailed analysis of their land use needs. The municipal level is an important local land use planning forum. Our case examples from Sodankylä municipality in Finland exemplify how challenging it may be to fully understand and manage cumulative impacts from new industrial projects. We note that effects of climate change are not yet incorporated in any assessments of impacts in any satisfactory manner.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
OtsikkoResource Extraction and Arctic Communities
AlaotsikkoThe New Extractivist Paradigm
ToimittajatSverker Sörlin
KustantajaCambridge University Press
Sivut125-141
ISBN (elektroninen)978-1-009-11004-4
ISBN (painettu)978-1-009-10023-6
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 8 marrask. 2022
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA3 Vertaisarvioitu artikkeli kokoomateoksessa

Tieteenala

  • Ympäristötiede

Sormenjälki

Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'How Should Impacts Be Assessed?'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Viite tähän julkaisuun