TY - JOUR
T1 - COVID-19 impact on social work admissions and education in seven international universities
AU - McFadden, Paula
AU - Russ, Erica
AU - Blakeman, Paul
AU - Kirwin, Gloria
AU - Anand, Janet
AU - Lähteinen, Sanna Leena
AU - Baugerud, Gunn Astrid
AU - Tham, Pia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Inter-country Social Work admissions and educational comparisons are difficult due to variance in policy and practices between Social Work educational providers, even within the same country. However, this paper aims to provide an examination of different levels of impact that COVID-19 ‘lockdown’ had on ‘admissions to social work’ processes and on education, using examples from universities in Australia, England, Finland, Northern Ireland, Norway, Ireland and Sweden. Already we know that across these examples, admission processes differ significantly. Variances are between selection and entry methodologies with some institutions using academic entry criteria and personal statements and inter-views, while others use academic entry criteria and relevant experience or academic entry only. We also know that practicum duration is variable across providers, lasting between 75 and 200 days. Despite all differences, a distinct adjustment to lockdown required a shift to virtual teaching methods for each institution. This paper seeks to explore the range of approaches adopted to lockdown in relation to practice learning placements in each example. We consider the underpinning values and principles that guided responses to these change processes in the various institutions and longer term implications emerging from the required rapid change processes are discussed.
AB - Inter-country Social Work admissions and educational comparisons are difficult due to variance in policy and practices between Social Work educational providers, even within the same country. However, this paper aims to provide an examination of different levels of impact that COVID-19 ‘lockdown’ had on ‘admissions to social work’ processes and on education, using examples from universities in Australia, England, Finland, Northern Ireland, Norway, Ireland and Sweden. Already we know that across these examples, admission processes differ significantly. Variances are between selection and entry methodologies with some institutions using academic entry criteria and personal statements and inter-views, while others use academic entry criteria and relevant experience or academic entry only. We also know that practicum duration is variable across providers, lasting between 75 and 200 days. Despite all differences, a distinct adjustment to lockdown required a shift to virtual teaching methods for each institution. This paper seeks to explore the range of approaches adopted to lockdown in relation to practice learning placements in each example. We consider the underpinning values and principles that guided responses to these change processes in the various institutions and longer term implications emerging from the required rapid change processes are discussed.
KW - Education
KW - professional practice
KW - training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091825438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091825438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02615479.2020.1829582
DO - 10.1080/02615479.2020.1829582
M3 - Article
SN - 0261-5479
VL - 39
SP - 1154
EP - 1163
JO - Social Work Education
JF - Social Work Education
IS - 8
ER -