Are Indigenous conceptions of sovereignty as non-interference patriarchal?

Rauna Kuokkanen, Sheryl Lightfoot, Gina Starblanket, Matthew Wildcat

Tutkimustuotokset: Kirjoitus lehdessä tai erikoisnumeron toimittaminenArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

1 Lataukset (Pure)

Abstrakti

In the field of International Relations, sovereignty refers to a state's authority to govern itself without external interference, closely tied to the principle of non-intervention. Recent scholarship has illuminated sovereignty as socially constructed and dynamic, yet non-interference remains central to its conception. Catherine MacKinnon's feminist critique exposes the patriarchal implications of fetishising non-interference, silencing marginalised voices, and perpetuating gendered power imbalances. This Forum examines whether Indigenous conceptions of sovereignty that prioritise non-interference are shaped by patriarchal ideologies, particularly through the emphasis on relationality - rooted in kinship - and the central role of consent in Indigenous understandings and practices of sovereignty. By examining the intersection of non-interference with systems of oppression, this paper contributes to a nuanced understanding of Indigenous sovereignty, self-determination, and gendered relations. It concludes with a discussion of the relationship between consent, non-interference, and non-domination.

Alkuperäiskielienglanti
Sivumäärä21
JulkaisuREVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
DOI - pysyväislinkit
TilaJulkaistu - 20 tammik. 2025
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli

Tieteenala

  • Sosiaali- ja kulttuuriantropologia

Sormenjälki

Sukella tutkimusaiheisiin 'Are Indigenous conceptions of sovereignty as non-interference patriarchal?'. Ne muodostavat yhdessä ainutlaatuisen sormenjäljen.

Viite tähän julkaisuun