AI Systems and Evidence Law in Finland

Juhana Riekkinen, Sofia Söderholm

Tutkimustuotokset: Kirjoitus lehdessä tai erikoisnumeron toimittaminenArtikkeliTieteellinenvertaisarvioitu

Abstrakti

In this report, we analyse how Finnish law applies to the use of AI in evidence-gathering and to AI-based evidence in criminal proceedings, and whether AI could be used to assess criminal evidence. As there are no statutes specifically on the use of AI in policing or criminal proceedings, these issues are governed by more general statutes, which largely adhere to the principle of technology neutrality. Evidence law is based on the free theory of evidence, which means that AI-based evidence is generally admissible. Predictive policing systems are currently not used in Finland, but the admissibility of AI-produced predictions would in any case be limited, as evidence that is not relevant to the facts of the case should be rejected. Further, unlawfully obtained AI-based evidence should be excluded if it might endanger the right to a fair trial. AI systems are not used to assess evidence in courts, and the use of fully automated systems is not permissible.
Alkuperäiskielienglanti
Sivut287–314
Sivumäärä28
JulkaisuInternational Review of Penal Law
Vuosikerta94
Numero2
TilaJulkaistu - 2023
OKM-julkaisutyyppiA1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli
TapahtumaArtificial Intelligence and Administration of Criminal Justice: International Colloqium, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 28th-31st March 2023 - Buenos Aires, Argentiina
Kesto: 28 maalisk. 202331 maalisk. 2023

Hakusanat

  • tekoäly
  • todistelu
  • rikosprosessi

Tieteenala

  • Oikeustiede

Viite tähän julkaisuun