The Sempra annulment decision of 29 June 2010 and subsequent developments in investment arbitration dealing with the necessity defence

Federica Cristani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

On 29 June 2010, an ad hoc International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Annulment Committee annulled the 2007 Sempra Award for manifest excess of powers (within the meaning of the ICSID Convention), as it found that the Tribunal had failed to apply the correct law. The decision took into account the measures adopted by the Argentine Government to face the 2001 economic and political crisis and (like other previous awards and decisions on similar cases) raised the issue of the interpretation and application of the necessity defence in situations of economic emergencies. The approach of the ad hoc Committee on this particular point is the main focus of this note.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-253
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Community Law Review
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013
MoEC publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Keywords

  • applicable law
  • emergency clauses
  • ICSID Annulment Decision
  • investment treaties
  • manifest excess of power
  • state of necessity* Sempra

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Sempra annulment decision of 29 June 2010 and subsequent developments in investment arbitration dealing with the necessity defence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Citation for this output