TY - JOUR
T1 - “Rights for Life” scenario to reach biodiversity targets and social equity for indigenous peoples and local communities
AU - Sarkki, Simo
AU - Pihlajamäki, Mia
AU - Rasmus, Sirpa
AU - Eronen, Jussi
N1 - Biological Conservation 280 (Special Issue “The central importance of social justice in conservation science”) 109958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109958
Funding Information:
This work has received funding under the European Union's Horizon 2020 - Research and Innovation Framework Programme under grant agreement no. 869471 (CHARTER) and through the MAKERA funds of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland. This work was also supported by the Academy of Finland (grant number 338558) and by the Kone Foundation. The authors would like to thank Sonja Kivinen for valuable discussions in the early stages of this work.
Funding Information:
This work has received funding under the European Union 's Horizon 2020 - Research and Innovation Framework Programme under grant agreement no. 869471 (CHARTER) and through the MAKERA funds of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland. This work was also supported by the Academy of Finland (grant number 338558 ) and by the Kone Foundation . The authors would like to thank Sonja Kivinen for valuable discussions in the early stages of this work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Scenarios are a powerful way in which the scientific community can inform future policies for transformative change. Forthcoming scenario work holds promise for the Nature Futures Framework, which through the concept of relational values, seeks to recognize a multiplicity of value positions on human-environment relations, including those of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs). The objective of this Perspective paper is to propose a novel scenario skeleton titled “Rights for Life”, which holds promise to achieve ambitious biodiversity targets in a socially-equitable ways by focusing on the Nature's and IPLCs' rights. We demonstrate, through the case of Arctic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) herding, that the “Rights for Life” scenario seems to deliver better social equity outcomes than the recently proposed “Half Earth” and “Sharing the Planet” scenarios that have been designed to achieve ambitious conservation and biodiversity targets. The “Rights for Life” scenario is particularly fit for sparsely-populated indigenous homelands and rural regions where local communities depend on culturally important nature-based livelihoods for their well-being. We recommend that future scenarios targeting human-environment relations should not only consider non-western and relational value perspectives, but also recognize the importance of Nature's and IPLCs' rights for ensuring transformative change for equity and the environment. Clear recognition of such rights can function as a basis for new regulations, market-based governance instruments, policies, and participatory governance instruments ensuring that violation of Nature's and IPLCs' rights by societal developments is recognized, avoided, minimized, or at least compensated for.
AB - Scenarios are a powerful way in which the scientific community can inform future policies for transformative change. Forthcoming scenario work holds promise for the Nature Futures Framework, which through the concept of relational values, seeks to recognize a multiplicity of value positions on human-environment relations, including those of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs). The objective of this Perspective paper is to propose a novel scenario skeleton titled “Rights for Life”, which holds promise to achieve ambitious biodiversity targets in a socially-equitable ways by focusing on the Nature's and IPLCs' rights. We demonstrate, through the case of Arctic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) herding, that the “Rights for Life” scenario seems to deliver better social equity outcomes than the recently proposed “Half Earth” and “Sharing the Planet” scenarios that have been designed to achieve ambitious conservation and biodiversity targets. The “Rights for Life” scenario is particularly fit for sparsely-populated indigenous homelands and rural regions where local communities depend on culturally important nature-based livelihoods for their well-being. We recommend that future scenarios targeting human-environment relations should not only consider non-western and relational value perspectives, but also recognize the importance of Nature's and IPLCs' rights for ensuring transformative change for equity and the environment. Clear recognition of such rights can function as a basis for new regulations, market-based governance instruments, policies, and participatory governance instruments ensuring that violation of Nature's and IPLCs' rights by societal developments is recognized, avoided, minimized, or at least compensated for.
KW - Arctic reindeer herders
KW - Biodiversity and ecosystem services
KW - Environmental governance
KW - Mitigation hierarchy
KW - Nature Futures Framework
KW - Rights-holders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150416379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85150416379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109958
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109958
M3 - Article
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 280
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
M1 - 109958
ER -