Activities per year
Abstract
The paper examines the disclosure of information within public contract awards under EU law. EU Public Procurement rules have several objectives that may at some times be conflicting with each other. A certain level of transparency of public procurement procedure is necessary in order to fight corruption, enhance trade opportunities and ensure effective legal remedies. On the other hand, too much transparency may have certain anti-competitive effects. The national laws regarding disclosure of information vary in different EU member states. In Finland the EU law principle of effective remedies has been interpreted as requiring full transparency among the bidders. The transparency rules under EU law and certain Member States’ national laws are analysed. As a conclusion, it is suggested that the rules on disclosure should not be left solely to the discretion of member states as the over-transparent approach taken by certain member states may negatively affect the markets both on a national and EU level.
Translated title of the contribution | Julkisuussääntely EU:n julkisissa hankinnoissa - tasapainottelua kilpailun ja läpinäkyvyyden välillä |
---|---|
Original language | English |
Pages (from-to) | 528-553 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | Journal of Public Procurement |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 4 |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2016 |
MoEC publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Field of science
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Disclosure Rules In EU Public Procurement: – Balancing Between Competition and Transparency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Activities
- 1 Position of trust in public sector
-
Finnish Ministry of Justice (External organisation)
Kirsi-Maria Halonen (Expert)
7 Oct 2021Activity: Membership or position of trust › Position of trust in public sector