TY - JOUR
T1 - Different backgrounds - different priorities?
T2 - Student perceptions of a technology initiative
AU - Eriksson, Miikka J.
AU - Vuojärvi, Hanna
N1 - Funding Information:
The study reported here is a part of the MobIT project funded by the Ministry of Education in Finland for the years 2007–2009. This study was a part of the research activities of CICERO Learning Network, Finland (http://www.cicero.fi). The authors would like to thank Doctoral Programme for Multidisciplinary Research on Learning Environments for training and support.
Copyright:
Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - A multitude of studies has assessed the success of different technology initiatives but rarely has the focus been on special groups. This paper examines whether university students with children and those without have different perceptions of a technology initiative where students were able to acquire university sponsored laptops and were provided with a wireless local area network around campus. The division of students into these two groups is based on earlier research suggesting that the study of students with children is heavily restricted by their multiple commitments and they might, therefore, have quite different priorities from other students in their perception of this technology initiative. The results acquired by the combined use of 'strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats' (SWOT) analysis and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) suggest that both students with and without children consider the increased 'effectiveness of studying' the most important strength of the laptop initiative. It seems, however, that students with children especially appreciate the mobility and flexibility that laptops and networks offer, while other students value more the functionality of the university infrastructure and are more concerned about the deteriorative effects of technology on communality within the university. Results, therefore, indicate that students' background affects their priorities when assessing technology initiatives and university attention to this may prevent drop out and prolonged graduation.
AB - A multitude of studies has assessed the success of different technology initiatives but rarely has the focus been on special groups. This paper examines whether university students with children and those without have different perceptions of a technology initiative where students were able to acquire university sponsored laptops and were provided with a wireless local area network around campus. The division of students into these two groups is based on earlier research suggesting that the study of students with children is heavily restricted by their multiple commitments and they might, therefore, have quite different priorities from other students in their perception of this technology initiative. The results acquired by the combined use of 'strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats' (SWOT) analysis and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) suggest that both students with and without children consider the increased 'effectiveness of studying' the most important strength of the laptop initiative. It seems, however, that students with children especially appreciate the mobility and flexibility that laptops and networks offer, while other students value more the functionality of the university infrastructure and are more concerned about the deteriorative effects of technology on communality within the university. Results, therefore, indicate that students' background affects their priorities when assessing technology initiatives and university attention to this may prevent drop out and prolonged graduation.
KW - analytical hierarchy process
KW - diversity
KW - laptops
KW - student experience
KW - students with children
KW - SWOT analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896544733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896544733&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2013.832165
DO - 10.1080/07294360.2013.832165
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84896544733
SN - 0729-4360
VL - 33
SP - 272
EP - 285
JO - Higher Education Research and Development
JF - Higher Education Research and Development
IS - 2
ER -